Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Forum section for Mars?

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    138

    Forum section for Mars?

    Well well,

    enterpisemission.com finally put up a page claiming that the Marlander came down in a field full of broken machinery and casing objects:

    http://www.enterprisemission.com/spirit.htm

    Since the Planet X failed prediction is now more than six months old and Nancy has fadedinto background of internet loons, is it time for a section about people who manipute pictures from Mars to "prove" their speculations about Martians?

    Dancar

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    2,031
    I was looking at Odessy pictures of the landing site last night, the area is more heavily cratered than I had thought it was. So, you have an area where the rocks have been taking a beating for millions if not billions of years. Naturally you are going to have rocks that have been shatered into all kind of shapes. What I see in the pictures are what I would expect rocks to look like that have been beat all to heck.

    Some time ago there were some pictures from MGS the woo woos claimed to show underground tubes. Artifacts of intellegence of course. Or the roots of some large plant. On the full 360 view NASA released today, scroll over to the hills, scroll back to the left a few degrees, down from the horizon is a line of small sand dunes. Now try and imagine what they would look like from above. Mystery solved, they are just sand dunes.

    But I doubt that Hoagland will see it that way.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    3,793
    I agree, there should. The Mars conspiracy loons are quite common on mainstream space sites as well. Mind you the Hoagland site is so far out now I wonder if he is not parodying himself, deliberately or not.

    The thrust of the loons is not "we have not gone to Mars" but "NASA (and now ESA as well) is hiding the truth about the real nature of Mars".

    Issues are:

    The Cydonia complex

    Martian "tunnels", "glass houses", "worms", trees", and supposed liquid water at the surface

    The "Ghoul" and apparent high failure rates

    Missing images

    Delays in data release

    Coloiur of Mars

    These need to be hit on the head hard before they get too entrenched.

    Jon

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    278
    Quote Originally Posted by JonClarke
    I agree, there should. The Mars conspiracy loons are quite common on mainstream space sites as well. Mind you the Hoagland site is so far out now I wonder if he is not parodying himself, deliberately or not.

    The thrust of the loons is not "we have not gone to Mars" but "NASA (and now ESA as well) is hiding the truth about the real nature of Mars".

    Issues are:

    The Cydonia complex

    Martian "tunnels", "glass houses", "worms", trees", and supposed liquid water at the surface

    The "Ghoul" and apparent high failure rates

    Missing images

    Delays in data release

    Coloiur of Mars

    These need to be hit on the head hard before they get too entrenched.

    Jon
    Until the end of time, people will think whatever they want to think, based on their own opinions. It's the fuel of wars, pointless debates and woowoo websites. But perhaps a mars forum might be good. I mean, in the next long while there will be a lot of new images and discoveries to be straightened out by the us, the level-headed.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    2,031
    Yeah worms, I forgot that those formations also were evidence of giant worms. :roll:

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    138

    Looks like basalt

    I don't know why Hogland thinks these rocks look like machinery or metal canisters. Most of the objects look like broken basalt to me - like you might see near Little Lake, California or eastern Washington State.

    Why go for a fantastic interpretation where the data looks more like an ordinary one?

    Dancar

  7. #7
    ...ummm...because if you only saw rocks, no one would pay any attention to him?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    452

    Re: Looks like basalt

    Quote Originally Posted by Dancar
    I don't know why Hogland thinks these rocks look like machinery or metal canisters. Most of the objects look like broken basalt to me - like you might see near Little Lake, California or eastern Washington State.

    Why go for a fantastic interpretation where the data looks more like an ordinary one?

    Dancar
    Because there's no money in stating a banal result.

Similar Threads

  1. About this section of the forum (for the natives)
    By ToSeek in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2010-Jun-16, 08:03 PM
  2. About this section of the forum (for new arrivals)
    By Fraser in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2009-Dec-15, 04:16 PM
  3. This new forum about Mars
    By The Bad Astronomer in forum Space Exploration
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 2004-Nov-16, 03:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •