Or are they one-time data points?
Or are they one-time data points?
"Occam" is the name of the alien race that will enslave us all eventually. And they've got razors for hands. I don't know if that's true but it seems like the simplest answer."
Stephen Colbert.
If you know the relative motion of the lensing body, I don't see why repeating observations is not possible.
"I'm planning to live forever. So far, that's working perfectly." Steven Wright
That is a big if, I believe.
SHARKS (crossed out) MONGEESE (sic) WITH FRICKIN' LASER BEAMS ATTACHED TO THEIR HEADS
If you are talking about the events observed by OGLE and MACHO, the answer is that the event is observed once per site doing the observing. If you had observers spread across the solar system, you could get a few hours of variation in the peak time for each event, and possibly get some data about the diameter of the FWHM of the lens, and hence more data than we have now about the distance to the lensing body.
Forming opinions as we speak
That effect is often known as lensing parallax, and has been observed between Earth and each of Spitzer, EPOXI, and Kepler. It is especially valuable to break the degeneracy between mass and transverse velocity of the lens. For typical events where both source and lens are stars in the Milky Way, the delay between locations a fraction of an AU apart is often several days (which works out from the numbers but I never expected intuitively).
Last edited by ngc3314; 2021-Jan-31 at 11:45 PM. Reason: typo