Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: One Moon Mapper suggestion

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2

    One Moon Mapper suggestion

    I heard about Cosmoquest from the Weekly Space Hangout. (I really like the hangout, but I'm at work when it's live, so I have to watch it later. Sorry I can't "+1" it, but I do watch.)
    One suggestion for the Moon Mapper-Simply Craters would be to give some tips on pinpointing the crater rims. Many of craters don't have well-defined rims and are at or near the 18 pixel lower limit, where one pixel makes a difference.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    171
    Hi Aliya, thanks for trying out the site and taking the time for feedback. We're working now on a small revision for marking craters. The idea is that when the "Mark Craters" tool is selected, there will be some sort of guide lines to help point out the minimum crater size as well as help you center the pointer to reduce fine-tuning later on. I can't give you any more details because they could still change.

    In terms of actually doing a 17 versus 18 pixel crater, well, that comes down to you. I've definitely found myself drawing to just what I think it is, but then expanding by 1 teensy pixel just to make it go green. And then smacking myself but not deleting it. That kind of issue will be taken care of, somehow, by me later on in processing. I'm still thinking of a few different approaches I could take.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    265
    Quote Originally Posted by astrostu View Post
    In terms of actually doing a 17 versus 18 pixel crater, well, that comes down to you. I've definitely found myself drawing to just what I think it is, but then expanding by 1 teensy pixel just to make it go green. And then smacking myself but not deleting it. That kind of issue will be taken care of, somehow, by me later on in processing. I'm still thinking of a few different approaches I could take.
    I'm glad to know that I'm not alone with that kind of problem.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by kmasterdo View Post
    I'm glad to know that I'm not alone with that kind of problem.
    It's actually pretty interesting psychologically.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    265
    Quote Originally Posted by astrostu View Post
    It's actually pretty interesting psychologically.
    Why that? Now I'm really curious.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by kmasterdo View Post
    Why that? Now I'm really curious.
    Well, I just think it's interesting. I mean, even I, who knows EXACTLY what I'm looking for and have done this for years, will stretch the marking occasionally by a pixel just to make it count. Don't know if there's a term for that or anything, I just think it's interesting.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    2
    Well, I don't know that I'm tempted to stretch the circle to make it count. I assume the 18 pixel size is a bit artitrary, not the Chandracrater limit. I thought there might be some physical clues in the pictures to help locate the rim. If the crater is not well-delineated, I'm just guessing where I think it is.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    171
    Ah, my apologies for misreading your question. There are no real clues in the image as to where the rim is, it just is where it is. The sharp craters are easy to figure out, the degraded ones not so much. The example images along the bottom are attempts to help you on that issue. But, in the end, it comes down to your judgement about where you think the rim belongs. Your estimate, along with everyone else's will get averaged together to create the agglomerate crater.

    And you are correct, 18 pixels is an arbitrary limit. We chose that for a few reasons: a. There wouldn't be a huge number of craters in any given image such that people just give up. b. It's somewhat doable on tablets. c. Larger craters are usually easier to see. d. There are still plenty of craters down to 18 pixels in size; these images get down to about 0.5 m/pixel, so we still expect to be able to build a database of craters down to 10 meters in diameter.

    We may adjust this in the future, but for now we're sticking with 18 pixels and we're going to see how it works out.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    47
    What's the thought's on another colored crater marker for " verifiably vague under this light ." (To coin a phrase for Stu .) I think something like that might be good for cross reference . Just thinking out loud again .

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    265
    Quote Originally Posted by astrostu View Post
    Don't know if there's a term for that or anything, I just think it's interesting.
    What about doing psychological studies on Moon Mappers?

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    232
    What are your ideas? We will be studying things like how time on image changes over time and things like that. I'm open to any other ideas you may have.

    Cheers,
    Pamela

Similar Threads

  1. My Moon Mapper Info
    By RoySalisbury in forum Moon Mappers
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 2012-Jan-23, 06:46 AM
  2. Q: Intent of the "Twitter" feed in moon mapper
    By RoySalisbury in forum Moon Mappers
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2012-Jan-17, 04:18 AM
  3. Mercury Mapper Is Really Hot Stuff
    By Fraser in forum Universe Today
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 2011-Jan-19, 01:50 AM
  4. show suggestion: where did Earth's Moon come from?
    By DaveHein in forum Astronomy Cast
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2006-Dec-16, 10:54 PM
  5. Star Mapper
    By PhantomWolf in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 2004-Oct-07, 04:04 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •