Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 31 to 58 of 58

Thread: Oct-Nov-Dec Quakes

  1. #31
    Guest
    Skipping ahead to a new level
    {and trying to find this level elsewhere}
    ( page 2 # 11 )
    anyway1? the question has arisen
    DUE TO AN X_tra.0rdinaraly active "Applause"
    if there were precurser activities on Venus
    {OR MARS / moon} prior to the 10/10 's
    -------------------------------------
    its no easy question
    because even where seismic equipment has been located
    "ON THE MOON"
    ================
    I have not found a way to retrieve even old data
    FROM A TIME WHEN THE EVENTS WERE PRIME TIME tv }
    so yeah Boo 11/10&9
    :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
    6:32 A.M. in a moment {long time actually}
    6:32 A.M. to maryland Nine died
    Brook HHHHHHHHHH art
    ???????????????????????????????
    _________________Pentagon help
    = flashing lights {vehicle tracks}
    white shirts ? 6:33 A.M. loos moose
    gas?car & clouds were Blue

    ROCKwill Md.

  2. #32
    Guest
    <a name="JD2452564"> page JD2452564 aka Lull at first quarter
    its far FAR to active ofan ACTIVE QUAKE"applause"
    to see this data very clearly .. i'll just say
    02/10/13 20:55:10 14.65S 175.37W 33.0 6.1M
    02/10/13 22:18:55 39.20N 106.62W 10.0 2.8M
    02/10/14 14:12:43 41.34N 142.06E 57.9 6.1M
    02/10/14 23:55:07 15.19S 69.43W 104.8 5.1M
    02/10/15 05:56:21 48.79N 128.39W 10.0 4.1M
    02/10/15 10:43:56 17.76S 178.75W 584.2 4.8M
    02/10/16 10:12:21 51.89N 157.32E 101.7 6.2M
    -------------
    the 10/15 4.1 & 4.8
    can be seen by me as a Lull
    between the 6.1's on the 13th, 14th, & 16th
    ================
    believe what you like
    BUT I believe this to be the "Most Easily"
    found sync point in the over all Quake pattern

  3. #33
    Guest
    10/19 12:09:04 44.34N 149.80E 33.0 6.2M A KURIL ISLANDS
    10/19 12:09:04 44.34N 149.80E 33.0 6.2M A KURIL ISLANDS
    10/22 11:39:04 20.47S 178.62W 551.6 6.2M A FIJI ISLANDS R
    10/23 11:27:18 63.62N 148.04W 10.0 6.7M A CENTRAL ALASKA
    10/24 03:34:26 48.23N 154.40E 33.0 5.6M A KURIL ISLANDS
    10/24 06:08:37 1.86S 29.02E 10.0 6.3M A LAKE TANGANYIKA
    10/24 21:53:42 6.07N 94.45E 58.9 5.6M A NICOBAR ISLANDS, INDIA
    1:
    2:
    http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...#20020718.1:52
    http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...#20020801.2:24
    http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...t=25#JD2452564
    http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...art=25#October 25, 2002
    7:
    <a name="October 25, 2002"> LINE October 25, 2002 aka October 25, 2002
    <a name="JD2452573.SF"> line JD2452573.SF aka Solar Flare ?
    anyway? about 2 min after Noon October 25, 2002
    I did pick up TVI & RFI which i TENTivLY identified as
    Solar particles?/? So the must have been A Solar Flare
    2 to nine days ago {in the Sothern Hemisphere}
    {on the Approaching (W ) wing that hit here 2day ?

    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-10-25 18:22 ]</font>

  4. #34
    Guest
    <a name="JD2452573.sf2"> page JD2452573.sf2 aka nOOn 2-10-25
    On 2002-07-18 22:33, beskeptical wrote: To? 1:57 P.M./23uct?/?
    OK? i did look at the GEOS X-RAY plots
    and at 18z there was an M spike
    {so if the noon TVI/RFI came from there?}
    23-18=5hrs ago = 3pmPDT-5 {does not ccompute
    {{ anyway IF it was the 18Ucut THEN its high speed (2hr) HARD electrons}
    if those there should be traces elsewhere as HI energy
    My guess is that High Speed ride on broken
    Fagnetic flux lines that extend Sun to Earth & back
    and are not fast on there own but take a fast Magnetic Flux Taxi here2Earth
    BE
    9,000 per DAY at mag 2.9 or smaller.

    Like I said, I'd be more concerned if they stopped.
    on the 14th there was an X_Tra.0rdinary base shift
    on Geos 8/9 and my guess? {Serius(the star)has sent signals to SUN so expect manUOv.or}

  5. #35
    Guest
    <a name="JD2452578.CME"> page JD2452578.CME aka CME


    <A HREF="http://www.solar.ifa.hawaii.edu/ARMaps/armaps.html">
    1: get spot number & location from hawaii </A>
    <A HREF="gopher://solar.sec.noaa.gov/11/plots/xray">
    2: get event time from Geos 8-9 xray </A>
    <A HREF="http://www.nso.noao.edu/synoptic/synoptic.html">
    3: check magnetic image from noao </A>
    those still "WORK"
    2: Anyway JD2452474 theres a report of an X-Class
    ==============================
    JD2452578 push to page 1 to follow a TV{ized}
    CME report: it look to far South to hit Earth
    { but i could not see North | South }
    1:
    2:
    3:
    4:
    5:
    6:
    7:
    8:
    9:

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    1,405
    We have been having many, small tremors lately, and some fairly large ones here. Of course this is Alaska though and I am paranoid so.. Who knows. -Colt

  7. #37
    Guest
    <a name="2-10-31.OA"> page 2-10-31.OA aka Oct "Applause"
    On 2002-10-30 23:40, Colt wrote: To? HUb's 5:30 A.M.
    We have been having many, small tremors lately, and some fairly large ones here. Of course this is Alaska though and I am paranoid so.. Who knows. -Colt

    the 2.'s are part of the "Eposodic Uplift"
    {every 2000th year (last was 0)
    the Pacific NW uplifts about 400 feet in 400
    years} about .5 to a foot a year.. appearently using small <3. Quakes.
    exactly how many per 100 feet i've not deduced.. don't confuss those with the
    5.6-6.5 Quakes of the Lunar cycle.. different trigger source ..? believe whaterev you like.. My guess the TV will no grt TVi from this

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    58
    Hey HU'b, have you included the 3.9's and 5.0's recently from England? The first was the 5.0 at Dudley (West Midlands), and has been followed by a 3.9 with multiple aftershocks at Manchester.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    514
    And don't forget the major quake in Italy this morning- 5.6 is the tenative reading.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    1,405
    We had a 6.5 just south of Denali Nation Park here the other day. Also lately I have been feeling a strange vibration in the ground, it only last for about a second then goes away. Of course when I ask if anyone else feels it they say no.

  11. #41
    Guest
    <a name="JD2452579.ESR"> page JD2452579.ESR aka England Swings A Rattle
    On 2002-10-31 12:41, Chief Engineer Scott wrote:
    Hey HU'b, have you included the 3.9's and 5.0's recently from England? The first was the 5.0 at Dudley (West Midlands), and has been followed by a 3.9 with multiple aftershocks at Manchester.
    4:33 P.M. pst ok i'll second the motion
    {um just a second i have to look to find seconds}
    E:T 16:34:02.21 Thu 10-31-2002 ===>
    there,
    Now about the inclusions?
    {lemme thin} Lunar Triggered 5.6 to 6.5
    Solar CME Responce 6.96 and Semi4 Signals From Sirus { um i forget was it 4.44 } 4the moon ? or Venus bact to tv ? Gun commercial:: Police story

  12. #42
    Guest
    <a name="JD2452579.it"> page JD2452579.it aka iTALy
    On 2002-10-31 12:49, Zathras wrote:
    And don't forget the major quake in Italy this morning- 5.6 is the tenative reading.
    --------
    the Quake you refer to was ?
    ? the lead story on Ch8 NBC
    see the TV news link page
    {line to TV links}{later}

  13. #43
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    5,455
    Why are you choosing this quake and that, here and there? I think I posted this link before:

    http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/

    There are hundreds of sites tracking quakes worldwide in real time. There are thousands of Mag 5 quakes annually, hundreds of Mag 6s, and a few 7s and occasional 8s every year. The pattern follows plate movements, not the Moon's pull nor Sunspots.

    Sigh.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    3,011
    On 2002-11-02 02:16, beskeptical wrote:
    http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/

    There are hundreds of sites tracking quakes worldwide in real time. There are thousands of Mag 5 quakes annually, hundreds of Mag 6s, and a few 7s and occasional 8s every year.
    From a link on that page: Significant Earthquakes of the World for 2002, "Earthquakes of magnitude 6.5 or greater or ones that caused fatalities, injuries or substantial damage."

  15. #45
    Guest
    <a name="2-11-02.CME"> page 2-11-02.CME aka CME 2-11-02
    A FEW DAYS AGO tv REPORTED A cme
    http://www.badastronomy.com/phpBB/vi...#JD2452578.CME
    AND i DID get a little RFI {no TVI} yesterday ? afternoon?
    http://wwwneic.cr.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/
    so i was pretty mild but some solar debris
    must have hit earth from the SOLAR EVENT
    From a link on that page: Significant Earthquakes of the World for 2002,
    the extraOrdanry part of it is the PHASE of solar
    activity {well never mind} 9:17 A.M. PST

    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-11-02 12:13 ]</font>

  16. #46
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    3,011
    On 2002-11-02 12:08, HUb' wrote:
    the extraOrdanry part of it is the PHASE of solar
    activity {well never mind} 9:17 A.M. PST
    I'd have to be convinced, but I encourage you to keep plugging away--science always should reinvestigate its premises. Otherwise, it's possible that a correlation between celestial events and earthquakes would be missed, should one ever occur. Although we haven't seen any in the past on Earth, we do know that quakes on other solar system bodies are effected. Perhaps we just haven't tried the right combination.

  17. #47
    Guest
    <a name="JD2452581.7"> page JD2452581.7 aka 7.
    On 2002-11-02 14:36, GrapesOfWrath wrote: To: November 2, 2002
    Wel there was a 7. Quake yesterday in Sumatra?
    Not that i've been following : but the 5. one in Italy
    Made news `cause a school building collapsed
    -------------------------
    I guess my point would be {if i were going to make one}
    { not ] that some CME charged particles were
    ariving on the Earths Surface during this time?
    {believe whatever you like} BWYL

  18. #48
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Posts
    5,455
    I also agree researching any potential connections to EQs and other events is worthwhile. But research of this nature needs to be systematic and comprehensive to have any value. The solar data is out there. The EQ data is out there. Analyze it. To just say, "look we had an EQ and the Sun just sent us a CME", or whatever, is not evidence of anything but a coincidental event.

    sigh.....
    _________________
    Evolution is just a theory. Better fasten your seatbelt, so is gravity.
    Beskeptigal.

    <font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: beskeptical on 2002-11-03 00:38 ]</font>

  19. #49
    Guest

    On 2002-11-03 00:37, beskeptical wrote:
    I also agree researching any potential connections to EQs and other events is worthwhile. But research of this nature needs to be systematic and comprehensive to have any value. The solar data is out there. The EQ data is out there. Analyze it. To just say, "look we had an EQ and the Sun just sent us a CME", or whatever, is not evidence of anything but a coincidental event.

    sigh.....
    _________________WELL?/? of course your correct
    with so little data its difficult to impossible to
    say much of anything .. However now theres another 7. in Alaska?
    I guess it was Argos pointed that out.. Sorry
    I do not do well at the name game: see 2003 {later
    {link line}

  20. #50
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    1,405
    Had another, fairly major, earthquake yesterday. 7.9, 200 miles north of Anchorage. It lasted for about 90 seconds. I wish someone would explain to me, in plain English, what is happening. -Colt

  21. #51
    Guest
    <a name=2-11-05".CQ"> page 2-11-05.CQ aka Quake cycles
    On 2002-11-04 15:30, Colt wrote: To? HUb'
    Had another, fairly major, earthquake yesterday. 7.9, 200 miles north of Anchorage. It lasted for about 90 seconds. I wish someone would explain to me, in plain English, what is happening. -Colt
    1st theres the Lunar Perigee at New or Full Moon
    { these Quakes tend to be in the 5.6 to 6.5 range}
    2nd theres an Eposodic uplift taking place
    {in the Pacific NW as whitnessed by the Alvord Desert}
    {link to the Alvord goes here} these are 2. quakes
    3rd Earth Responce Solar Triggerd Quakes
    { these are the big ones >6.9 and occur when solar particles hit Earth

  22. #52
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    1,405
    Oh. Makes you feel kind of special knowing those great balls of rock and burning gases pay attention to our small rock. [img]/phpBB/images/smiles/icon_smile.gif[/img] -Colt

  23. #53
    Guest

    solar eruption? 10/29 2003

    Quote Originally Posted by HUb'
    &lt;a name="20020718.1:52"> page 20020718.1:52 aka Xray Flare / CME ?
    &lt;A HREF="http://www.solar.ifa.hawaii.edu/ARMaps/armaps.html">
    1: get spot number &amp; location from hawaii &lt;/A>
    &lt;A HREF="gopher://solar.sec.noaa.gov/11/plots/xray">
    2: get event time from Geos 8-9 xray &lt;/A>
    &lt;A HREF="http://www.nso.noao.edu/synoptic/synoptic.html">
    3: check magnetic image from noao &lt;/A>
    1: its been years ago now : Maybe those still "WORK"
    2: theres a report of an "EVENT" on the 6oclock news today 10/29
    3: &amp; my figure for Solar Event {x} to
    4: ERq {Earth Responce Quake} [ IF 1 occures ]
    5:has been 50 hours from x to Q
    6: ok TV reports "A.B." {maybe today}
    7: my numbers are still 2days PLUS 2hrs {BWUW}
    8: and besides what i saw on TV was ( . ) solar centered
    9: be a 6.0 or a 6.9 {but wh knows} SO NO SIX's do I see {this 1}
    10 now on with the TAIL
    1: its off season for Lunar triggared Earth ;;; ? "SEASON" in?
    2: Quakes caused by the Perigee of the Moon
    3: coinsiding with the Moon at New Or Full
    4: in Oct-Nov-DEC its "NEW" and the 5.6 - 6.5 um 1st.14 = 11/1
    5: Quake activitys about 1/2 what it will be
    6: in OCT-Nov-Dec etc.. in fact its a rather
    7: Quiet, Quiet period
    8: So back to x &amp; ErQ 2:03 A.M. PST/2:08 A.M. it looks like
    9:the links still "WORK" though i've not viewed the downloads
    20filename: latest.gif ?2:25 A.M. ? X=#30 &amp; 36 has Aim
    A.20020718_xray.gif 2:25 A.M. it was 7/18@9Z {?} +50 = 7/20@11Z
    B.a filename: pm4.jpg / I got a download from each &amp; Will do so soon
    I could "NOT" decode pm4.jpg (not that it matters) [Thumbs down]
    HUb' 2-7-18 in responce to b.$'s
    120 mag 6.x &amp; 800 mag 5.x [I use 5.6 to 6.5]
    60 .+. ......400 ?=450 / 4 for 3 month season = 110ish [suspect it]? or 110/3 = 40 / Month {i dont think so}
    nOON October 25, 2002 {PICKED UP tvi/RFI} SEE October 25, 2002
    &lt;font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-07-19 00:30 ]&lt;/font>

    &lt;font size=-1>[ This Message was edited by: HUb' on 2002-10-25 17:41 ]&lt;/font>
    yeah yeah see next edition?NEXT ED?
    http://www.solar.ifa.hawaii.edu/ARMaps/armaps.html thats a 1
    2= gopher://solar.sec.noaa.gov/11/plots/xray
    3# http://www.nso.noao.edu/synoptic/synoptic.html
    10/29 yeah yuckie yellow NEXT TRY?
    i did not connect to gopher://solar.sec.noaa.gov {TRY#3}
    ---------------------------------------------------------yeah?YEAH...
    based upon NO.Go.Mints.peppermint+flavor
    my 4cast is 0
    no hittum EArth this try!
    ====================
    Wyh YoU ask
    because its not "Approaching Edge" Launch site
    but from the center of the circle. SoNo Flux
    :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::
    it seams plaine and simple to me
    and no NO. lights eithor
    even tho there will be light reported
    ????????????????????????????????????
    it just aint so .. pureEST dill_LUTUM

  24. #54
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    660
    Had a thought the other day hub...

    see what you think

    global warming is melting the ice caps, presumably it is also decreasing the overall dencity of water, thermodynamics an all that (?) that then decreases the overall weight of the water sitting on the crust of the earth
    less weight = less pressure. Less pressure = more movement of the mantle= more movement of the crust. Ta Da =D>

    how does that sound?

  25. #55
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    871
    there is also a theory that water acts as a lubricant between faults. (doesn't necessarily mean i accept it, just have heard it).

    think of it as a barometer. more water liquid, it has to go somewhere. rising sea levels is a good choice. maybe though the weight of the extra water on the water below pushes it into the faults or something (the same way air pressure pushes mercury harder so it rises up the tube.)

    who knows. i don't. :-? just a thought.

  26. #56
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    660
    further thoughts

    last night in bed I was musing - just before I fell asleep I thought - actualy even though the volume changes the overall weight is probably a constant - bummer

    but - yes man, I have heard that water lubricates fault lines to, read a paper on it some time ago, it suggested that where large damns have been built there is a small increase in siesmic activity in the surrounding area. will now try to find it.

    by the way hub apparently there was a 6.6 earthquake in or near Japan thursday/friday time, hope that helps - will find the info and post.

    ED FOR FOUND INFO
    SUGGS
    A major earthquake occurred at 01:06:28 (UTC) on Friday, October 31, 2003. The magnitude 7.0 event has been located OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)

    HOPE THIS HELPS

  27. #57
    Guest

    oppsii/

    Quote Originally Posted by carolyn
    further thoughts

    last hub apparently there was a 6.6 earthquake in or near Japan thursday/friday time, hope that helps - will find the info and post.

    ED FOR FOUND INFO
    SUGGS
    A major earthquake occurred at 01:06:28 (UTC) on Friday, October 31, 2003. The magnitude 7.0 event has been located OFF THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)

    HOPE THIS HELPS
    11/5 DARK BLUE
    sorry:
    i have not been paying attention!
    i'll mend my way {maybe}
    ----------------------------------------
    TRY1:? how about "A" link to your web site
    that might work for US
    ============================
    or try MINE.. http://web.pdx.edu/~pdx00782
    click forum {not that it works .. really it does not}
    :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::
    or try http://www.sailing.pdx.edu
    click on PRESS:: May15 new:: then near the bottom :Feedback
    ???????????????????????????????????????????????
    when all else fails ... UM I moniter FSR CH12
    24hrs/day 7days/week .. but its a two block range ?
    //tilt\\ in other words 12th and Jefferson {SW pdx}
    now back to the regularly scheduled..{um? sixes}?

  28. #58
    Guest

    I didnt pay any attention

    density = 3? olive dec 1st 2003?
    if anything did happen this season I missed it completely
    {OK other than the Solar Non Events, i mean}

Similar Threads

  1. This Week in Quakes
    By dgavin in forum Geology & Planetary Surfaces
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 2012-Apr-13, 07:22 PM
  2. Is it possible for gas giants to have quakes?
    By Gamefreak89 in forum Space/Astronomy Questions and Answers
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 2010-Dec-04, 11:29 AM
  3. 3 Berkeley Quakes
    By Pleiades in forum Off-Topic Babbling
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 2006-Dec-25, 12:35 AM
  4. Two Java Quakes
    By Blob in forum Science and Technology
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 2006-Jul-21, 03:18 PM
  5. Martian Quakes
    By xbck1 in forum Astronomy
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 2004-Jan-28, 03:59 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •