Something prior to this has left its mark on this one.
You won’t find it in the CMB.
Printable View
Something prior to this has left its mark on this one.
You won’t find it in the CMB.
Evidence?
Please be aware that we are not supposed to discuss religion on this board, so if you are thinking of making such an argument, I would suggest reviewing the board rules.
If you have some scientific argument for what you think is the “real reason for life in the universe” though, let’s hear it.
I won’t find what in the CMB?Quote:
You won’t find it in the CMB.
I guess I'm also confused by the question. What do you mean by "reason"?
The Wiki article on the Cosmic Microwavw Backround is here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic...ave_background
And Van Rijn's discussion suggesetions are very good.
My theory is that a time traveler stopped to pee in the prebiotic ocean, seeding it with life.
Everyone knows it was because Jean-Luc Picard solved Qs test and stop the anti time anomaly, and realized we did not travel in space but just needed to travel in ones mind.
I thought life was the universe learned about itself.
Well, when you start a thread and it almost immediately fills up with jokes, it's probably a little discouraging.
Grant Hutchison
Perhaps, but this was posted in the Off-Topic Babbling section, there were serious questions and comments made and it appears the OP hasn’t been back since that post. Hopefully, they will have something more to say eventually. My guess is that this might be more appropriate for ATM.
That's my take on it. If you post in OTB, you should expect side comments and jokes. I'd move it to someplace more serious if I knew what the OP was talking about, but it is unclear if they are serious or not, and whether this is ATM or not. At 46 posts they are not a newbie, and should have at least a concept of how this place works.
Boom!
I feel like this is a sort of question you would want to ask siri and she would say 42 or some none-sense like that
alromario
I assume that your post is in response to mine. I don't know what "Boom!" signifies. So please answer directly - what is the purpose of this thread? Is this a joke, or a serious discussion. Are you proposing a real reason for life in the universe, and if so, what is that reason.
Please answer with you next post.
Biology is intrinsically linked to Consiouness.
The universe is conscious.
The universe is ?
Sorry, I didn’t know.
Don’t.
Consciousness is an error bubble of an existing mind.
All sorted, thanks for listening!
Hello, alromario. We are part of the Universe, so we can say the Universe contains consciousness, but science has yet to determine for sure how consciousness arises or why we have "existing minds".
We have plenty of threads speculating on the nature of consciousness, some of them quite lengthy. (fair warning, some of the threads get very repetitive and at times, argumentative at a less than conducive level)
You might do a Forum search on the keyword "consciousness".
And chemistry is intrinsically linked to biology, and physics is linked to chemistry. Dynamic structures all based on the core laws of the Universe. Matter, energy, heat, and motion.
The Anthropic Principle reflects on this; it says if any constant of the Universe were slightly different, life could not arise, at least not in any form we would recognize, and so there's be no consciousness. The implication is that we're a Goldilocks Universe, "just right".
Of course we can't necessarily call this purposeful, we are not the "reason" for these constants rather we are a natural result of them. We can't really know what the odds were of our existence being of this balanced sort, maybe this is the only way a Universe can be. Or there might be a Multiverse of possibilities where things could go "just wrong", or led down other equally good paths.
Likewise, we cannot determine if our consciousness, however you define that, was the only possible way for thinking minds to work unless we someday come across or make other types of mind and consciousness. I suspect from my own experiences as a "neuro-diverse" autistic who's been in the mental health system most of my life, that we are narrowly provincial in the conception of mind, let alone other possible brain structures.
You use the hot word “real” which colours your question about “life” . The matter universe has its structure with quantum weirdness, probability and so on. Life has function or behaviour, eggs, eating, reproduction, death. Plus memory as DNA. Now you can choose to believe in consciousness in your model of “reality” and make it a third estate, or part of matter or part of life. That is up to you and no test can be devised to be scientific about it. Just plonk it in the “untestable belief” set and move on, I suggest, to what you can test.