Activity Stream

I cannot argue that position. They made some assumptions and when they had empirical data contested their assumptions they abandoned those...

They confirmed and refined previous observations. Observations which compliment but do not conflict with the early probes, Apollo dosimetry, or more...

My contest are noted. I am not sure Robert Braeunig conducted penetration test. ...

This information is to demonstrate that Nasa had made some assumptions about lunar surface GCR levels but had not actually measured the lunar...

No it was approximately .24 mgy/day, get this fact through your head. Therefore the dose received was lower than the average dose, but well within...

I am not sure but I think we all can agree that GCR during the Apollo 11 mission was .24mgy/day? I am also not sure but I think we all can agree...

There is nothing to resolve, all his work was given to anyone on his former web page. That you feel there is conflict is your inability to grasp...

Bolding added.

I can only rely on the official postings of NASA and other scientific postings. I will make this simple by saying I am unable to answer your...

There was not a question posed in #381 Take this opportunity to pose your question.

Confusing the issue with extraneous and unrelated points is an apparent act of deflection,. It is in the pursuit of truth that I try to retain the...

No, that does not adequately answer 381. Though there are a bunch of older questions you've similarly ignored.

Do not accuse someone else of lying, even as a joke and leave moderation to the moderators. Watch it. Public accusations of sockpuppetry...

Here are the questions I asked, four? five? six? Too many times to bother keeping track . . . including earlier today: ...

Given the tiny changes and the overwhelming similarity (down to the "So let's recap"), you are testing my belief in that statement, but we'll let it...

Same difference., It was not shielded by the Apollo crafts. In 1969 the US did not measure the neutron flux generated by GCR and had no idea that...

Is it to difficult to post the question you desire an answer to? I am trying to accommodate you. Make it easy for me.

NASA didn't have to rely on assumptions. As already noted, lunar surface radiation was first measured in 1966. Chang'E-4 measured a different...

As expected, you show fear.

Actually, even as an American, the use of "us" as in "give us a kiss" doesn't seem that strange. I don't think I would use it myself, but wouldn't...

Lead me to the question or state it. I have no idea of which one you are interested in.

No. NASA has realized it's assumptions about radiation on the lunar surface were in error. They now have empirical information to adjust their...

You've already been provided with this (as Clanger notes above). Please answer my questions from post #371.

Stop the delaying. Answer Van Rijn's questions first. That's a direct request. You seem reluctant to answer our questions, but they are not going...

Should have given it a tail number.

The salient point is the surface radiation is higher than cislunar space. .6mrad/hr was NASA's belief in the Apollo era. NASA learned in 2009 that...