Activity Stream

Nope. Not getting away with it. Your claim is pure handwavium if you can't answer my specific questions. Where is the contemporaneous cis-lunar...

This is the claim you made. I don't need a lesson about vectors. What stikes me is your second sentence, gravity very definatley s used to change...

That would be several "magic tricks".

) There's no such thing as a "holzmann transfer". 2) The Apollo TLI trajectory was not a Hohmann transfer orbit. 3) The Apollo lunar transfer orbit...

Just so it is clear. If I post in purple, it is official business as a moderator. This is true for all moderators, though there are some personal...

My claim does not entail faked 2019 data. If you want research done unrelated to my claim then you are on your own.

Just because you don't know how a magic trick is done does not mean it is not a magic trick.

Nope, not getting away with that. I've pointed out repeatedly that you can't compare 1969 data to 2019 data. What I want from you is some 2019 data...

https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna34470642#.WuYJ14gvyUm

Well, concerning the Apollo missions to the moon (10 thru 17) there's tons of information to analyze proving it wasn't faked. I can see a nation...

Another typical non-answer. Evidence for what can be found from what NASA scientist? As usual, you don’t answer the questions asked. I don’t...

I never said gravity was not a force. I said it is a vector. I am not sure if you understand what a vector is but a force is a vector.

I showed you the quote. I did not make it up.

At this point I am afraid to respond to your questions but here we go. According to NASA they suspected that GCR radiation might irradiate the...

I will acknowledge that if the ellipse was a plane that was not at a right angle to the VAB it might show curvature depending on the length of the...

So why would that mean the Moon landings were fake? Your logic makes no sense. If the NASA didn't know the Moon was a source of radiation (and...

Under the typical Poisson assumptions, occurrence of events is independent, and they still cluster. The clustering is just due to random variation -...

The evidence can be found between the quotes from the NASA scientist. If you feel he is incorrect then your argument is with him and not me. The...

You contention is trivially easy to falsify, here is a link to a 1970 paper on neutron activation products in lunar samples. ...

Ah, so are you now saying you didn’t make a claim that an astronaut would receive a higher radiation dose on or near the Moon than in cislunar space?...

Distraction. The sun's motion through the galaxy, earth's orbit around the sun, etc are not relevant to our discussion; for our purposes we are...

I remember some dude that proclaimed on YT that gravity wasn't a force, was that you? Regardless, you should stay out of YT if you want to learn. ...

The point is to support your claims with evidence. Are you now admitting you can’t support your claims about the lunar radiation environment? We’ve...

No, my contention was NASA was surprised to find the Moon was a source of radiation.

The earth is both rotating on its own axis and orbiting around the sun and it is also hurtling through space at some fantastic speed and all of that...

When viewed in the same plane as the orbit, yes it is represented by a straight line assuming no other forces act on the orbit to change its plane. ...

That's not an "academic exercise"; it was the entire crux of your argument before you Gish galloped over to the VAB.

I abandoned that academic exercise because with out corresponding information from 1969 it could be asserted that is was apples and oranges and...